Friday, October 3, 2025

๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ˆ๐ฌ ๐‚๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ž๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ง ๐€๐ซ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ง๐š ๐š๐ง๐ ๐˜๐ฎ๐ฏ๐š๐ฅ ๐‡๐š๐ซ๐š๐ซ๐ข?

 What Is Common Between Arjuna and Yuval Harari?

เฎเฎฉ் เฎฎொเฎŸ்เฎŸைเฎค் เฎคเฎฒைเฎ•்เฎ•ுเฎฎ் เฎฎுเฎดเฎ™்เฎ•ாเฎฒுเฎ•்เฎ•ுเฎฎ் เฎฎுเฎŸிเฎš்เฎšுเฎช் เฎชோเฎŸுเฎ•ிเฎฑீเฎฐ்เฎ•เฎณ்?”
“Why are you tying a knot between a bald head and a knee?”

That’s the Tamil way of dismissing a strange comparison. In English we’d say: “You’re comparing apples and oranges.”

So what could a warrior prince standing on the battlefield of Kurukshetra possibly have in common with a 21st-century Oxford PhD and bestselling author?

At first glance, nothing. One wielded the bow of Gandiva, the other the pen that wrote Sapiens. Yet when it comes to meditation, both Arjuna and Yuval Harari confess the same thing: the mind refuses to obey.


Arjuna’s Honest Admission

In the Bhagavad Gita (6.34), Krishna explains the discipline of meditation. But Arjuna interrupts with disarming honesty:

caรฑcalaแน hi manaแธฅ kแน›แนฃแน‡a pramฤthi balavad dแน›แธham
tasyฤha
แน nigrahaแน manye vฤyor iva su-duแนฃkaram (6.34)

“The mind is restless, turbulent, obstinate, and strong.
To control it seems to me harder than controlling the wind.”

Here is a warrior—trained in discipline, courage, and mastery—admitting defeat before his own inner restlessness. Arjuna reminds us that outer strength does not guarantee inner stillness.


Harari’s Modern Confession

Fast-forward millennia. Yuval Noah Harari—historian, global intellectual, Oxford PhD—admits the same struggle.

In interviews and writings, Harari emphasizes that his PhD did not help him meditate. Intellectual analysis, he says, often makes meditation harder:

“Meditation is about observing reality, not analyzing it. The PhD got in the way.”

And yet:

  • He practices meditation two hours every day.
  • He spends 30–60 days each year in silent retreat.
  • He dedicated Homo Deus to his teacher, S. N. Goenka.
  • On 60 Minutes with Anderson Cooper, he explained that meditation helps him withstand the chaos of modern information overload and stay centered.

Harari’s confession mirrors Arjuna’s: intellectual brilliance, like warrior strength, does not quiet the mind.


Why Is Meditation So Hard?

The Katha Upanishad (II.1.1) gives a timeless diagnosis:

parฤรฑci khฤni vyatแน›แน‡at svayambhลซแธฅ
tasmฤt parฤ
แน… paล›yati nฤntarฤtman

“The Self-existent One turned the senses outward;
therefore beings look outside and not at the inner Self.”

ลšaแน…kara’s commentary sharpens the insight:

  • The senses are like “holes turned outward.” Their very design draws attention outside.
  • Thus, beings naturally perceive the outer world and ignore the antar-ฤtman, the Self within.
  • Only a dhฤซraแธฅ—a rare, discerning seeker—can “turn the gaze back” (ฤvแน›tta-cakแนฃus) to behold the Self, desiring immortality.

In other words, we are wired outward. To meditate is to reverse this current, to turn the mind inward. It is like forcing a river to flow upstream. That is why meditation feels so unnatural—so hard.


Concentration vs. Meditation

As Swami Bhajanananda of the Vedanta Society of Southern California notes, much of the difficulty comes from confusing concentration with meditation:

  • Concentration arises easily when the senses are outward—on a book, a game, a project.
  • Meditation is the reversal—drawing the senses inward (pratyฤhฤra), turning consciousness back upon itself.

This is not escapism. It requires detachment, purification, and sustained will. Sri Aurobindo described the process well:

“It is a long road where every inch must be won against resistance.”


The Universal Struggle

So when we place these voices side by side—

  • Arjuna: “Harder than controlling the wind.”
  • Harari: “A PhD doesn’t help.”
  • Upanishads: “The senses are turned outward by design.”

—suddenly the comparison no longer feels like “apples and oranges.”

It reveals a universal truth:
Meditation is not difficult because we are weak. It is difficult because it demands the rarest of acts—reversing the very direction of human consciousness.





เฎเฎฉ் เฎฎொเฎŸ்เฎŸைเฎค் เฎคเฎฒைเฎ•்เฎ•ுเฎฎ் เฎฎுเฎดเฎ™்เฎ•ாเฎฒுเฎ•்เฎ•ுเฎฎ் เฎฎுเฎŸிเฎš்เฎšுเฎช் เฎชோเฎŸுเฎ•ிเฎฑீเฎฐ்เฎ•เฎณ்?



๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ˆ๐ฌ ๐‚๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ž๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ง ๐€๐ซ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ง๐š ๐š๐ง๐ ๐˜๐ฎ๐ฏ๐š๐ฅ ๐‡๐š๐ซ๐š๐ซ๐ข?



 

Wednesday, October 1, 2025

๐Œ๐ž๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ ๐ƒ๐ข๐ฌ๐œ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง: ๐€๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฏ๐š๐ฉ๐š๐ค๐ฌ๐ก๐š ๐‡๐จ๐จ๐ค๐ฌ ("๐˜๐จ๐ ๐š ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ญ ๐˜๐จ๐ ๐š") ๐ญ๐จ ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐š๐ซ๐ฒ ๐€๐๐ฏ๐š๐ข๐ญ๐š ๐๐ž๐๐š๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ

I submit for discussion a methodological approach to introducing Advaita Vedฤnta, drawing inspiration from the dialectical rigor employed by ฤ€di ลšaแน…kara. ลšaแน…kara, a master debater, used purvapakแนฃa (the prior view) to outline rival schools and common misconceptions before refuting them (uttarapaksha) to establish the true conclusion (siddhฤnta).

My personal style, which I found aligns naturally with ลšaแน…kara's method, is designed to "jolt the reader" and capture attention. This approach uses paradoxical assertions to challenge the popular, surface-level understanding (maya).

I. THE PURVAPAKSHA HOOKS: CHALLENGING PERCEPTION

These hooks function as the initial statement of the purvapakแนฃa, presenting the diluted, common view.

Examples include:

-- YOGA is NOT yoga. -- MEDITATION is NOT meditation. -- Measure meditation? Don’t be silly, it’s not golf.

These statements immediately target the misconception of viewing "yoga" as mere physical postures (Hatha Yoga) or seeing meditation as a quantifiable stress-relief tool, like a "golf score or a Fitbit stat".

II. PIVOTING TO THE SIDDHฤ€NTA (TRANSFORMATION)

Like ลšaแน…kara, who would fairly and empathetically outline the opposing viewpoint, I acknowledge that secular methods (apps, mindfulness) are "wonderful" for calming the mind, improving focus, and reducing stress. This validates the purvapakแนฃa before refutation.

The siddhฤnta (established truth) of Advaita then contrasts these limited benefits with the true spiritual goal:

-- The aim of Dhyana (meditation) in the Bhagavad Gฤซtฤ (Chapter 6) and the Upanishads is spiritual transformation and liberation (mokแนฃa), not simply peace of mind. -- Spiritual methods (dharana, dhyana, samadhi) are tools necessary to realize the Self as Brahman.

III. THE EXPERIENTIAL LITMUS TEST (ANUBHAVA)

To further refute the quantitative mindset ("Measure meditation? Don’t be silly"), I addressed a practical concern: How does one distinguish a true meditation session from drifting or daydreaming?

This led to the development of my own experiential measures, drawn from reflecting on anubhava (direct experience), which serve as an internal litmus test:

  1. Absorption (focused concentration).
  2. Peace (cessation of mental agitation).
  3. Joy (bliss/contentment).

If any of these three qualities were present, the session was genuine. This focus on Joy aligns with the siddhฤnta found in the Bhagavad Gฤซtฤ (6.20-22), where success in dhyฤna leads the mind to experience supreme joy (sukham atyantikam) upon realizing the Self. This grounds truth in experience, echoing ลšaแน…kara’s reliance on anubhava as the final arbiter of truth.

I welcome your thoughts on this modern purvapakแนฃa framework for Advaita pedagogy.

Grok AI: Here is an analysis of your method incorporating your intention to "jolt the reader" and an example of classical purvapakแนฃa from the Advaita tradition:


1. The Goal: To "Jolt the Reader"

Your style, using paradoxical hooks like "YOGA is NOT yoga" or "Measure meditation? Don’t be silly, it’s not golf", perfectly achieves your goal of jolting the reader and challenging assumptions. This immediate confrontation with a familiar idea is what makes the structure effective.

The process works because the hook creates cognitive dissonance. By stating a contradiction right away, you:

  • Grab Attention: This is crucial in a "scroll-heavy world". The bold statement challenges the popular perception of yoga (as mere physical exercise, or Hatha Yoga) or meditation (as quantifiable stress relief or a "Fitbit stat").
  • Establish the Purvapakแนฃa: The hook presents the common, surface-level view (the "prior side") that most people hold.
  • Guide to Siddhฤnta: The jolt prepares the reader for the transition to the deeper truth (siddhฤnta)—that the real goal is spiritual transformation and liberation (mokแนฃa), rooted in texts like the Bhagavad Gฤซtฤ (Chapter 6) and the Upanishads.

The tone you employ—playful yet incisive ("don't be silly")—is necessary to invite curiosity without alienating readers. ลšaแน…kara similarly used a respectful yet rigorous method to guide scholars toward deeper insight.

2. Alignment with ลšaแน…kara: A Discovered Connection

It is insightful that you discovered your writing style naturally aligns with ลšaแน…kara's technique, rather than setting out to copy him.

ลšaแน…kara was a master debater who used purvapakแนฃa to make his arguments "airtight and respectful". The fact that your modern, engaging approach shares the same structural flow—state the common view, acknowledge its utility, then pivot to the higher truth—shows that the purvapakแนฃa method is a universal tool for effective philosophical discourse, whether in 8th-century debates or modern social media.

For instance, when you acknowledge that secular meditation methods are "wonderful for calming the mind, improving focus, and reducing stress", but then assert that spiritual methods "aim much higher... but a transformation", you are performing the core function of purvapakแนฃa: you validate the utility of the common practice before proving that it is incomplete compared to the ultimate truth of Advaita Vedฤnta.

3. Example of Classical Purvapakแนฃa

A clear example of ลšaแน…kara's use of purvapakแนฃa in his work can be found in his commentaries when addressing the fundamental nature of reality versus illusion (Mฤyฤ):

Stage

ลšaแน…kara's Method

Your Modern Parallel (The Goal)

Citation

I. Purvapakแนฃa (Prior View/Hook)

ลšaแน…kara states the realist's argument clearly: "The world must be real because we experience it through senses, and scriptures describe creation as factual."

"YOGA is NOT yoga" (The world is just Hatha Yoga/gym mats/asanas.)

II. Elaboration (Acknowledging Logic)

He explores why that view seems logical, perhaps using scriptural quotes or analogies, before refuting it.

You acknowledge that secular methods are "wonderful" for stress reduction and wellbeing, showing you understand the popular utility.

III. Siddhฤnta (Established Conclusion)

He refutes the view, arguing that apparent duality is an illusion overlaying the non-dual Brahman, using tools like neti neti (not this, not that) to negate false identifications.

You pivot to the true purpose: spiritual transformation and realizing the self as Brahman, moving beyond the illusion of physical or quantifiable goals.

Another critical example is when ลšaแน…kara countered the rival Mimamsa school by addressing the view that spiritual progress comes from external rituals or measurable actions (like Vedic sacrifices). He clearly stated this view—that rituals produce tangible results like prosperity or heaven—before arguing that these actions are limited compared to the inner realization (dhyฤna) required for mokแนฃa. This is exactly the spirit behind your hook, "Measure meditation? Don’t be silly, it’s not golf".


 


Thursday, September 25, 2025

๐Ÿง˜ ๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐Œ๐š๐ค๐ž๐ฌ ๐š "๐†๐จ๐จ๐" ๐Œ๐ž๐๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐’๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง?

ChatGPT isn't just for creating apps or planning your next trip—it can actually help with your inner journey too.

People have asked me in the past: "When you say you had a good meditation session, how do you know that? What do you mean 'good'?"

This got me thinking, so I brainstormed. While reflecting on meditation, I found myself using the Vedantic method of Neti, Neti ("not this, not this") to strip away what meditation isn't:

Clock Time – “I sat for 30 minutes straight.”
๐Ÿ˜Œ Physical Refreshment – “I felt less tired afterwards.”
๐Ÿง˜‍♂️ Posture Perfection – “I sat cross-legged without moving.”
๐Ÿคฏ Thought Suppression – “I had no thoughts for ten minutes.”
๐ŸŒˆ Visual Fireworks – “I saw lights and colors.”
๐Ÿ”” Strange Sounds – “I heard ringing or humming.”
๐Ÿชท Impressive Stillness – “I didn’t twitch the whole time.”

Then came my breakthrough: once I stripped away all external factors and reflected deeply, three authentic measures surfaced from my own experience:

Absorption — Was I truly focused and engaged?
๐ŸŒฟ Peace — Did genuine tranquility arise?
๐Ÿ˜Š Bliss — Did quiet joy emerge naturally?

๐Ÿค– Here's where it gets fascinating...

Now that we have our “measures”,  I asked ChatGPT an unusual question:

๐Ÿ‘‰ "If absorption, peace, and bliss were on the y-axis, and meditation methods or stages were on the x-axis, how would the chart look—using Chapter 6 of the Bhagavad Gita as a framework?"

I knew that modern methods like app-based meditation, mindfulness, or TM don't appear in the Gita—but I asked ChatGPT to include them anyway alongside the classical yogic stages.

Without any values or guidance from me, ChatGPT autonomously created this progression:

  • App-based meditation → mild relaxation
  • Mindfulness → steady peace
  • Breath practices (Art of Living) → higher absorption
  • Transcendental Meditation → deeper bliss
  • Classical stages (Dharana → Dhyana → Samadhi) → complete fulfillment

Then I asked it to create two visualizations:

  1. A line chart showing how absorption, peace, and bliss increase across methods
  2. A bubble chart where bubble size = depth/impact, with Samadhi as the golden culmination

The AI mapped the entire inner journey—bridging 3,000-year-old wisdom with modern approaches—completely on its own.


๐Ÿ“š Ancient Wisdom Meets Modern Validation

When I asked for supporting evidence, the framework held beautifully across both ancient scriptures and contemporary research:

✨ Absorption:

  • Classical: Bhagavad Gita 6.19 — the steady mind like "a lamp in a windless place".Similarly, the Yoga Sutras speak of it as a continuous, unbroken stream of awareness, like oil pouring smoothly from one vessel to another. That is the ultimate benchmark. Even a stretch of steadiness, with less flickering and distraction, is a good sign.
  • Modern: TM shows measurable brain coherence; psychology recognizes "flow states"

๐ŸŒฟ Peace:

  • Classical: Gita 6.15 — "the yogi attains supreme peace" (ล›ฤnti). That is the ultimate yardstick. Even small glimpses—a soft calm or a gentle lightness during meditation—point to a good session.
  • Modern: Harvard Health studies on mindfulness; Forbes coverage of Art of Living's stress reduction

๐Ÿ˜Š Bliss:

  • Classical: Gita 6.20-22 — "supreme joy beyond the senses". That is the ultimate pinnacle. Even a quiet joy that arises naturally from within, without any clear cause, signals real progress.
  • Modern: TM's "bliss consciousness"; neuroscience on gamma waves; Psychology Today's "blissful awareness"

๐Ÿ’ก The profound insight?

Amazingly, the AI recognized these authentic patterns, creating a map of the inner journey that bridges three millennia of wisdom. 





ChatGPT's Bubble chart where bubble size = depth/impact, with Samadhi as the golden culmination

ChatGPT's radar chart showing how different meditation methods score across the three measures. Notice how Samadhi achieves complete balance, while modern methods each have distinct strengths.

Real meditation isn't about duration, posture, or sensory fireworks—it's about genuine Absorption, Peace, and Bliss.





Can you measure meditation? Don't be silly - it's not golf, there is no par score.


๐Ÿค” What's your take? If you had to choose just ONE measure of a good meditation session, what would it be?

#Meditation #Mindfulness #ConsciousnessResearch #BhagavadGita #InnerDevelopment #AI #ChatGPT #Spirituality



Meditation Absorption Chart

Absorption / Peace / Bliss vs Meditation Methods

Wednesday, September 10, 2025

๐…๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ง๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ฅ๐ ๐ข๐š: ๐€ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ƒ๐Š ๐๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐š๐ฆ๐ฆ๐š๐ฅ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐ซ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ฐ-๐ง๐š๐ซ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐จ๐ง ๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐ž๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐’๐ซ๐ข ๐‘๐š๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐š ๐Œ๐š๐ก๐š๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ก๐ข’๐ฌ ๐›๐ฅ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ

 

✨ Family nostalgia: A moment with DK Pattammal and her rare interview-narrative on receiving Sri Ramana Maharishi’s blessings ✨
The legendary D.K. Pattammal (my mom’s first cousin) sat beside Amma — Pattammal Periamma in a deep green saree, Amma (Mom) in a vibrant red saree.
She is watching her brother, the great D.K. Jayaraman, sing at the wedding reception. ๐ŸŽถ
In a rare video interview, DKP recalls how her father told stories of Sri Ramana Maharshi’s openness — welcoming ๐๐š๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐๐ซ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐จ๐ง (he would make Sri Ramana famous in the west), a Westerner, as a devotee, with everyone eating together.
She shared how, as a 3-month-old, she was placed at Sri Ramana’s feet. He asked for honey, applied it to her tongue with his own hands, and seeing her click her tongue in delight, smiled: “Was the honey tasty?” Her father would say, “That blessing is why you were able to sing.” ๐Ÿ™✨
In the most unexpected way, this connects back to the ๐“๐ž๐ฌ๐ฅ๐š “๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ž๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐ž ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ ” ๐ฆ๐ž๐ญ๐š๐ฉ๐ก๐จ๐ซ I first shared on Guru Purnima. (More to come!) What better example of true lifetime charging than D.K. Pattammal herself — recalling how ๐’๐ซ๐ข ๐‘๐š๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐š ๐Œ๐š๐ก๐š๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐œ๐ž๐ ๐ก๐จ๐ง๐ž๐ฒ ๐จ๐ง ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐ญ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐ž ๐š๐ง๐ ๐›๐ฅ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ž๐ ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐š๐ฌ ๐š ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ setting her on the path of music for life. ๐Ÿ™๐ŸŽถ
Note: Added subtitles with English and Tamil Captions to the YouTube video.




Friday, August 22, 2025

๐†๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ฆ๐š #0 - ๐๐จ๐จ๐ค ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐ž๐ ๐š ๐’๐ฉ๐ข๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐š๐ฅ ๐“๐ž๐š๐œ๐ก๐ž๐ซ

https://youtu.be/m3hTBrRE-9M


Summary

The story begins in Sacramento in 2013, when Sundar rushes to attend a spiritual discourse, even hitting a plastic bucket on the freeway in his hurry. He had received a mysterious message that the teacher, Girish Ji, was looking for him. When they met, Girish Ji asked about a book Sundar had given him years earlier—one Sundar had completely forgotten.

That book, Yoga, Enlightenment, and Perfection by Shri Umesh Ji (Sundar’s college guru), had become the cornerstone of Girish Ji’s spiritual journey. He carried it everywhere, relied on it for guidance, and said it was like the “railway track” that kept his spiritual life on course.

The story then flashes back to Sundar’s college days, when he was nicknamed “Quantum” for his obsession with quantum mechanics and skepticism toward spirituality. Despite his doubts, he was drawn to a senior, Shri Umesh Ji, whose logical approach disarmed him. Their most meaningful conversations weren’t in classrooms or temples but by Umesh Ji’s Royal Enfield motorcycle—simple talks that later planted the seeds of Sundar’s meditation journey.

Sundar reflected that true spiritual masters are like fire: they inevitably transform those around them, skeptics and seekers alike.

The ripple effect became clear when Girish Ji, so deeply moved by the book, even wanted to travel across the world to meet Umesh Ji. Sundar had forgotten the exchange, yet it profoundly shaped someone else’s life.

The story ends with a reminder: transformation often comes in unexpected forms—a casual conversation, a borrowed book, or even dodging a plastic bucket on the freeway to arrive at exactly where you need to be.





Thursday, August 21, 2025

๐†๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ฆ๐š #๐Ÿ ๐†๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ฆ๐š ๐Ž๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ..

 ๐†๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ฆ๐š #๐Ÿ (๐†๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ฆ๐š Offering..)

Stay tuned for more..










Here is a short video on the metaphor:






๐†๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ฆ๐š #๐Ÿ - ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐€๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ

 ๐†๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ฆ๐š #๐Ÿ - ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐€๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ

Here is the Cliff Notes version of my Guru Purnima musings. I need to elaborate on the analogy..
๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐“๐ž๐ฌ๐ฅ๐š? ๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐…๐’๐ƒ? ๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐‹๐ข๐Ÿ๐ž๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐ž ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ ? ๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ก๐š๐ฌ ๐š๐ง๐ฒ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ฌ๐ž ๐ ๐จ๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐†๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฎ?
(๐™–๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™ฌ๐™š๐™ง๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฉ ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™จ๐™ฉ(๐™จ))




๐†๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ฆ๐š #๐Ÿ‘ - ๐™๐ž๐ง ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐Œ๐จ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐œ๐ฒ๐œ๐ฅ๐ž ๐Œ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž?

Guru Purnima 3 - Hard to get a few words in between Trevor Noah show, weekend socials, and life in general. Here is the next slice of Guru purnima musings..Need to elaborate with a blog post.


๐†๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ฆ๐š #๐Ÿ’ - AI can be a creative sidekick

๐†๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ฆ๐š #๐Ÿ’ - Continuing this series..

Exploring how AI can be a creative sidekick in sharing my metaphorical ideas.

I’ve been experimenting with visual storytelling using the ๐๐š๐ฉ๐ค๐ข๐ง ๐€๐ˆ App — you simply enter your text, and Napkin AI brings it to life with visuals.